Although I haven’t been back to church on a Sunday since we left I am still in touch with people that do still attend. I have found out, for instance, that Inaspace is not doing terribly well since our departure.
This saddens me a little but doesn’t really suprise me. I don’t say that out of some conceited notion that it was ‘all about us’ but I do think that we did Inaspace really well and for one very simple reason. We got it.
If it goes under then so be it. Everything has its time and maybe time is up for this particular activity/group. I understand that in their attempts to breathe new life into things they are going to start doing it bi-weekly and in the evening instead of the morning. Both good initiatives, however, in order to inject some new ideas they are going to troop over to a cafe church in Timperley for inspiration. Quite apart from my general disdain for the whole ‘cafe-church’ phenomenon, how are they going to pick up what will work in Edgeley, ostensibly a poor working class area, from people in Timperley, an altogether more middle class and affluent place?
Moving the time etc. is a good move because it will work better for the people that attend and that is the key to the whole thing. BCLC and latterly Inaspace worked because of the place, the time and the people that attended. Once one of those changed (the place) something got lost along with it that has necessitated changing one or both of the other elements. But it did not and has never, to my recollection, been so bad in terms of content that it needed to replicate stuff that other churches were doing.
And so I fear for its future, but then if it doesn’t die then nothing can grow in its place so maybe it’s for the best.